Re: FW: Postgresql on win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Postgresql on win32
Date: 2001-01-22 16:01:01
Message-ID: 21537.980179261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> Question: Can I assume that configure.in stays the way it is now? In the way
> that if I could just extract the line "VERSION='xyz'" from it, that will
> continue to work? It might be possible to do something around that.

That'd be OK with me. I don't suppose Win32 has "sed" though :-(

> I thought it *was* already centralised in 7.0, but back then it was in a
> header file (version.h), which made it cross-platform... I'm sure there is
> some advantage of having it in configure.in, but it does make it a *lot*
> harder to support it on Win32, with it's very limited scripting environment
> (by default).

Actually, it might be easier to go back to keeping it in a file
version.h (NOT .in) which configure could read it out of. I never
figured out why Peter put it directly in configure.in in the first
place; that means it is actually hard-coded in two files (configure.in
and configure) which is a recipe for trouble. Peter?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2001-01-22 16:01:13 AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2001-01-22 15:52:33 Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)