Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)

From: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)
Date: 2001-01-22 15:52:33
Message-ID: 20010122175233.A8658@l-t.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:30:17AM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Is anyone looking at doing this? Is this purely a MySQL-ism, or is it
> something that everyone else has except us?

Afaik either Informix or Sybase (both?) has it too. Dunno about
anything else.

>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:03:58 -0600
> From: Dave Glowacki <dglo(at)sweetpea(dot)ssec(dot)wisc(dot)edu>
> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
> Cc: Radovan Gibala <gigi(at)agraf(dot)sk>, ports(at)freebsd(dot)org
> Subject: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB
>
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Radovan Gibala wrote:
> > > Is there any possibility to get a port for MySQL with BerkleyDB support?
> > > I realy need the transaction support and I'd like to build MySQL from a
> > > port.
> >
> > why not just build PgSQL, and have transaction support *with* subselects
> > and everything else that mySQL doesn't have?
>
> I'd *love* to use PgSQL, but it doesn't support cross-DB joins (or at
> least I couldn't figure out how to do it.) MySQL handles this, so
> I'm using MySQL and would also like to have transaction support...
>
>

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-22 16:01:01 Re: FW: Postgresql on win32
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2001-01-22 15:48:14 RE: FW: Postgresql on win32