| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] cache question |
| Date: | 1999-11-22 07:02:43 |
| Message-ID: | 21492.943254163@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can someone explain why there are two network_ops in the pg_opclass
> table?
Looks like one is for type inet and the other for type cidr. I'm
still confused about the difference between the two types (hey,
I ain't Paul Vixie) but I suspect we don't really need two entries
in pg_opclass for them --- the types are binary-equivalent according
to parse_coerce.h. If we do need two entries, they should be given
different names.
> This stuff confusing.
It's 1:30AM EST ... way past time to be doing serious work, at least
in this time zone ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-22 15:17:19 | Re: [HACKERS] cache question |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-22 06:50:50 | Re: [HACKERS] cache question |