Re: [HACKERS] cache question

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Can someone explain why there are two network_ops in the pg_opclass
> > table?
>
> Looks like one is for type inet and the other for type cidr. I'm
> still confused about the difference between the two types (hey,
> I ain't Paul Vixie) but I suspect we don't really need two entries
> in pg_opclass for them --- the types are binary-equivalent according
> to parse_coerce.h. If we do need two entries, they should be given
> different names.

Done. That's how I did it.

> > This stuff confusing.
>
> It's 1:30AM EST ... way past time to be doing serious work, at least
> in this time zone ...

Yes, I wanted to get it working. Seems like it works now. Will commit
soon.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026