From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, sbernikov(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17055: Logical replication worker crashes when applying update of row that dose not exist in target partiti |
Date: | 2021-06-12 01:37:05 |
Message-ID: | 2139835.1623461825@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Still, the current style is not a pattern I think we should spread
> around, as a lot of copy-paste gets done in new tests added and one
> would easily mix up queries with pattern checks. The practice I'd
> like to encourage is something like the attached, to make clear that
> there is no risk to fetch incorrect logs.
If you prefer. However, I'd note that this patch as it stands
sort of breaks the argument I just made, as now you are interrogating
the postmaster's state after sending SIGHUP and before doing anything
that will wait for that to take effect. I think you should move the
location-capture commands down by at least one safe_psql call.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-12 01:49:04 | Re: BUG #17055: Logical replication worker crashes when applying update of row that dose not exist in target partiti |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2021-06-12 01:35:51 | Re: BUG #17055: Logical replication worker crashes when applying update of row that dose not exist in target partiti |