Re: [Testperf-general] Re: ExclusiveLock

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, testperf-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Testperf-general] Re: ExclusiveLock
Date: 2004-11-18 23:19:52
Message-ID: 21214.1100819992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Would it be possible to: when a new block is allocated from the relation
> file (rather than reused), we check the FSM - if it is empty, then we
> allocate 8 new blocks and add them all to the FSM. The next few
> INSERTers will then use the FSM blocks normally.

Most likely that would just shift the contention to the WALInsertLock.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-11-18 23:37:40 Re: [Testperf-general] Re: ExclusiveLock
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-18 23:17:49 Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status