| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status |
| Date: | 2004-11-18 23:17:49 |
| Message-ID: | 21183.1100819869@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Consistently? I'd have thought that problem would only fail once in a
>> while. It's hard to believe the timing would work out to make it a 100%
>> failure.
> You can see the history of the latest build runs here:
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=spoonbill&br=HEAD
Remarkable. There is one run (2004-11-15) where it got past the rtree
test (and did indeed fail at seg) but the failure rate is certainly
upwards of 90%. Curious. There must be some effect that is
synchronizing the bgwriter's actions with the test sequence.
Back at the ranch, I am even more surprised to note that the bogus
seg output in the 11-15 run is different from what it is in today's.
There's not much I can do about it without access to a machine where
it's failing though. Can we get personal accounts on the buildfarm
machines?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-18 23:19:52 | Re: [Testperf-general] Re: ExclusiveLock |
| Previous Message | Ruey-Lung Hsiao | 2004-11-18 23:13:29 | "no snapshot has been set" error |