Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenBSD/Sparc status
Date: 2004-11-18 23:17:49
Message-ID: 21183.1100819869@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Consistently? I'd have thought that problem would only fail once in a
>> while. It's hard to believe the timing would work out to make it a 100%
>> failure.

> You can see the history of the latest build runs here:
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=spoonbill&br=HEAD

Remarkable. There is one run (2004-11-15) where it got past the rtree
test (and did indeed fail at seg) but the failure rate is certainly
upwards of 90%. Curious. There must be some effect that is
synchronizing the bgwriter's actions with the test sequence.

Back at the ranch, I am even more surprised to note that the bogus
seg output in the 11-15 run is different from what it is in today's.
There's not much I can do about it without access to a machine where
it's failing though. Can we get personal accounts on the buildfarm
machines?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-11-18 23:19:52 Re: [Testperf-general] Re: ExclusiveLock
Previous Message Ruey-Lung Hsiao 2004-11-18 23:13:29 "no snapshot has been set" error