From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
Date: | 2018-07-23 04:15:53 |
Message-ID: | 21149.1532319353@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 09:42:08PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> So, +1 from me for having a directory for each extension.
> So, like Stephen, that's a +1 from me.
Same here. One-file-per-extension is too strongly biased to tiny
extensions (like most of our contrib examples).
I don't have a real strong opinion on whether it's too late to
push this into v11. I do not think it'd break anything other than
packagers' lists of files to be installed ... but it does seem
like a new feature, and we're past feature freeze.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-07-23 04:24:27 | Re: wrong query result with jit_above_cost= 0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-23 04:01:01 | Re: Non-portable shell code in pg_upgrade tap tests |