| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-portable shell code in pg_upgrade tap tests |
| Date: | 2018-07-23 04:01:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20428.1532318461@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A quick trawl of the buildfarm logs says most of our animals compute
>> SHELL = /bin/sh anyway, and so would be unaffected. There's a sizable
>> population that find /bin/bash though, and one active critter that finds
>> /bin/ksh.
> Except for the FreeBSD boxes, right? I thought that using directly
> /bin/ and not /usr/local/bin/ was considered an abuse of Linux in their
> universe.
No, I'm pretty sure that "sh" wins a place in /bin even on FreeBSD ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-23 04:15:53 | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-23 03:58:58 | Re: Tips on committing |