Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol

From: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol
Date: 2023-04-05 22:16:19
Message-ID: 2105AF20-C99E-410B-9673-E64C40AAD394@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Makes sense to me. I'll look at that again today, potentially apply
> the fix on HEAD.

Here is v6. That was my mistake not to zero out the es_total_processed.
I had it in the first version.

--
Regards,

Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Fix-row-tracking-in-pg_stat_statements.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-05 22:55:10 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-04-05 22:09:37 Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol