From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: unresolved bugs |
Date: | 2010-01-07 13:10:36 |
Message-ID: | 21026.1262869836@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> *sigh* - that was mostly ment as a joke and not a really serious
> comment. However the idea I actually had with BZ back in the days was
> not to use it as a full fledged tracker(in the sense of exposing it to
> users or developers)
> Instead I would just use it as the background engine that does nothing
> more than being subscribed to -bugs, tracks the stuff there and provides
> an summary export about (not)replied to reports. If somebody later on
> wants to annotate the emails/reports there (as in solved,open,moved to
> todo,not a pg core question,whatever) fine - if not fine as well :)
bugzilla doesn't really interface to email well enough to do that.
I gather that debbugs might work better, but I have no personal
experience with it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2010-01-07 13:45:55 | Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior |
Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-01-07 12:52:37 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |