Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Huh? All the ones that are reporting kernel call failures certainly
>> have %m.
> Oops, you're right. I was looking at the wrong code. Yeah, that
> should probably be fixed. I'm not sure it's a good idea to do that
> right now though.
It's a trivial enough change that I wouldn't see a problem with doing it
now. But if you do, please get it in by say 2PM EDT.
regards, tom lane