Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Srinath Reddy <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?
Date: 2025-01-26 16:19:57
Message-ID: 20890.1737908397@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Srinath Reddy <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> as suggested did the changes and attached the patch for the same.

Uh ... what in the world is the point of changing
BufferIsExclusiveLocked's signature?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2025-01-26 16:30:52 Re: Eagerly scan all-visible pages to amortize aggressive vacuum
Previous Message Mahendra Singh Thalor 2025-01-26 15:48:16 Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall