From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ./configure argument checking |
Date: | 2006-10-12 23:26:39 |
Message-ID: | 20888.1160695599@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> IIRC it was made a non-fatal warning somewhere near the end of the
>> output, but I'm not sure...
> It spits out this line just before it creates its output files:
> *** Option ignored: --with-lkjasdf
Of course, since it spits out pages and pages of normally-useless trivia,
we've all become conditioned to ignore configure's output as long as it
doesn't actually fail :-(
Not sure what to do about that --- I doubt that raising this warning to
error would be a good idea, seeing how firmly the upstream developers
believe it shouldn't even be a warning. Is there any sort of "quiet
mode" possible that would report only warnings? Would it be a good idea
if it were possible?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Chacon | 2006-10-12 23:42:51 | Re: Modification to the postgres catalog |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-12 23:18:41 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16. |