Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c - updated

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial refactoring of plperl.c - updated
Date: 2010-01-10 18:11:11
Message-ID: 20753.1263147071@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 01:16:13AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Doesn't make forcibly remove the target file if the command fails?

> Andrew, perhaps you could apply the attached to fix that. (Or I could
> bundle it into one of the split out plperl feature patches.)

Applied.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-10 18:16:59 Re: ECPG patch causes warning
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-10 18:05:28 Re: RADIUS authentication