From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables |
Date: | 2003-06-26 02:37:48 |
Message-ID: | 20518.1056595068@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that "source" is worth knowing.
Hm, possibly. Any other opinions?
>> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
>> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree
>> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?
> I vaguely remember the thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00190.php
> I don't see any followup (agreements or disagreements). Do you want me
> to change that while I'm at it?
No, I can handle it (and it should be a separate commit anyway).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-26 02:42:02 | Re: row description for domain in 7.4 |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-06-26 02:15:31 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2003-06-26 05:13:16 | Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-26 01:45:13 | Re: ecpg fix |