Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables
Date: 2003-06-26 02:37:48
Message-ID: 20518.1056595068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that "source" is worth knowing.

Hm, possibly. Any other opinions?

>> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
>> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree
>> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?

> I vaguely remember the thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00190.php

> I don't see any followup (agreements or disagreements). Do you want me
> to change that while I'm at it?

No, I can handle it (and it should be a separate commit anyway).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-26 02:42:02 Re: row description for domain in 7.4
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-06-26 02:15:31 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-06-26 05:13:16 Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-26 01:45:13 Re: ecpg fix