Re: $foo $bar is BAD

From: Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Melvin Davidson <melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com>, John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: $foo $bar is BAD
Date: 2016-04-16 00:30:18
Message-ID: 2051528.XhJx27HHnp@coyote
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday, April 15, 2016 8:13:56 PM EDT Melvin Davidson wrote:
> *Thanks for the sympathetic feedback John. I understand people are
> reluctant to change. It was just my intent to enlighten others as to the
> true background behind it.*
> *So if it's not about to change, then I'll just have to cry $boo $hoo, $oye
> $vey. :)*

Reading this:

http://programmers.stackexchange.com/a/80609

it appears to me that the true origin is not what you claim it to be, but pre-
war MIT pranksters.

And besides: language evolves. Words change meaning over time. Nobody typing
'foo = 2*bar' thinks about WW2 acronym, and everybody reading it immediately
understands it, again without referring to that acronym.

The horse is dead, Jim. Stop beating it.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Devoy 2016-04-16 02:00:59 Re: $foo $bar is BAD
Previous Message Melvin Davidson 2016-04-16 00:13:56 Re: $foo $bar is BAD