From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
Date: | 2006-08-25 16:10:52 |
Message-ID: | 2051.1156522252@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:30 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
>> Umm, why export all these functions. For starters, does this even need
>> to be in libpq?
> Where else would you put it?
> ...
> initdb has different requirements. Let me know if you have a different way to
> refactor it that satisfies initdb.
Um, but initdb doesn't use libpq, so it's going to need its own copy
anyway. I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API
seems like useless clutter.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bob Pawley | 2006-08-25 16:35:21 | Inserting Data |
Previous Message | epost2 | 2006-08-25 16:09:09 | getting on the system |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-25 16:16:33 | [Open Item] Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2006-08-25 16:03:08 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |