| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Date: | 2006-08-25 18:13:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200608252013.40132.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Um, but initdb doesn't use libpq, so it's going to need its own copy
> anyway.
initdb certainly links against libpq.
> I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API
> seems like useless clutter.
Where else to put it? We need it in libpq anyway if we want this
behavior in all client applications (by default).
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 18:30:19 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2006-08-25 17:58:51 | Re: FW: Serverlog 100GB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 18:30:19 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Previous Message | Martin Atukunda | 2006-08-25 18:02:43 | Re: [HACKERS] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case |