From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vladimirlesk(at)yandex-team(dot)ru, dsarafan(at)yandex-team(dot)ru |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line |
Date: | 2019-03-06 15:38:12 |
Message-ID: | 203FEBDD-7DD9-4C39-8B28-C95F349D958B@yandex-team.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
> 20 февр. 2019 г., в 17:06, Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> написал(а):
>
>>
>> I will work out this one with postgres -C and come back till the next commitfest. I found that something similar is already used in pg_ctl and there is a mechanism for finding valid executables in exec.c. So it does not seem to be a big deal at the first sight.
>>
>
> I have reworked the patch, please find new version attached. It is 3 times as smaller than the previous one and now touches pg_rewind's code only. Tests are also slightly refactored in order to remove duplicated code. Execution of postgres -C is used for restore_command retrieval (if -r is passed) as being suggested. Otherwise everything works as before.
>
> <v4-0001-pg_rewind-options-to-use-restore_command.patch>
The new patch is much smaller (less than 400 lines) and works as advertised.
There's a typo "retreive" there.
These lines look a little suspicious:
char postgres_exec_path[MAXPGPATH],
postgres_cmd[MAXPGPATH],
cmd_output[MAX_RESTORE_COMMAND];
Is it supposed to be any difference between MAXPGPATH and MAX_RESTORE_COMMAND?
Besides this, patch looks fine to me.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-06 15:38:13 | Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-03-06 15:24:42 | Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function |