From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Buildfarm: Enabling injection points on basilisk/dogfish (Alpine / musl) |
Date: | 2025-04-13 02:10:39 |
Message-ID: | 20250413021039.bb.nmisch@google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 07:51:06PM +0200, Wolfgang Walther wrote:
> With injection points enabled, I get the following errors in test_aio:
>
>
> [15:14:45.408](0.000s) not ok 187 - worker: first hard IO error is reported:
> expected stderr
> [15:14:45.409](0.000s)
> [15:14:45.409](0.000s) # Failed test 'worker: first hard IO error is
> reported: expected stderr'
> # at t/001_aio.pl line 810.
> [15:14:45.409](0.000s) # 'psql:<stdin>:88: ERROR: could
> not read blocks 2..2 in file "base/5/16408": I/O error'
> # doesn't match '(?^:ERROR:.*could not read blocks 2\.\.2 in file
> \"base/.*\": Input/output error)'
> It seems like it's just the error message that is different and has "I/O"
> instead of "Input/output"?
Looks like it.
> On a more general note, does enabling injection points make any sense here?
Yes, it does.
> I see that coverage in the build farm is not very big. IIUC, those are a
> development tool, so might not be relevant, because nobody is developing on
> Alpine / musl?
No, whether anyone develops on the platform is not a factor. One hasn't fully
tested PostgreSQL until one builds with injection points.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhishek Chanda | 2025-04-13 03:43:15 | Adding error messages to a few slash commands |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-04-12 23:45:14 | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |