Buildfarm: Enabling injection points on basilisk/dogfish (Alpine / musl)

From: Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Buildfarm: Enabling injection points on basilisk/dogfish (Alpine / musl)
Date: 2025-04-12 17:51:06
Message-ID: 02d5e802-49c0-42b0-b627-474512665051@technowledgy.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I recently enabled more features on my two buildfarm animals basilisk
and dogfish, which are running on Alpine with musl-libc in a docker
container.

--with-libnuma and --with-liburing seemed to work fine and have been
enabled for the last few runs, but --enable-injection-points does not [1].

With injection points enabled, I get the following errors in test_aio:

[15:14:45.408](0.000s) not ok 187 - worker: first hard IO error is
reported: expected stderr
[15:14:45.409](0.000s)
[15:14:45.409](0.000s) #   Failed test 'worker: first hard IO error is
reported: expected stderr'
#   at t/001_aio.pl line 810.
[15:14:45.409](0.000s) #                   'psql:<stdin>:88: ERROR: 
could not read blocks 2..2 in file "base/5/16408": I/O error'
#     doesn't match '(?^:ERROR:.*could not read blocks 2\.\.2 in file
\"base/.*\": Input/output error)'

5 more tests in that suite fail with similar errors. Full logs in the
artifact downloads of the CI run [2].

It seems like it's just the error message that is different and has
"I/O" instead of "Input/output"?

On a more general note, does enabling injection points make any sense
here? I see that coverage in the build farm is not very big. IIUC, those
are a development tool, so might not be relevant, because nobody is
developing on Alpine / musl?

Best,

Wolfgang

[1]: https://github.com/technowledgy/postgresql-buildfarm-alpine/pull/100

[2]:
https://github.com/technowledgy/postgresql-buildfarm-alpine/actions/runs/14420687470?pr=100

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-04-12 18:26:29 Re: remove unnecessary explicit type conversion (to char) for appendStringInfoChar function calls
Previous Message Srirama Kucherlapati 2025-04-12 17:09:41 RE: AIX support