Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date: 2025-04-01 06:22:41
Message-ID: 202504010622.trl6mwy2ge2z@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Mar-31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> Given where we are in the cycle, it seems to make sense to stick to using the
> schedule we already have rather than invent a new process for generating it,
> and work on that for 19?

No objections to that. I'll see about getting this committed during my
morning today, so that I have plenty of time to watch the buildfarm.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Are you not unsure you want to delete Firefox?
[Not unsure] [Not not unsure] [Cancel]
http://smylers.hates-software.com/2008/01/03/566e45b2.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafael Thofehrn Castro 2025-04-01 06:23:43 Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-04-01 06:09:10 Re: Fix slot synchronization with two_phase decoding enabled