From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Will Storey <will(at)summercat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset |
Date: | 2025-03-24 16:00:51 |
Message-ID: | 202503241600.yvjgclho4y45@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
I don't understand why this shouldn't work exactly like
vacuum_index_cleanup (cf. vacuum_rel lines 2170ff). That would require
no new mechanism.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Java is clearly an example of money oriented programming" (A. Stepanov)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2025-03-24 16:06:51 | Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-24 15:58:56 | Re: Modify SHOW to display reloptions by accepting table-qualified names. |