From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |
Date: | 2025-02-04 14:22:47 |
Message-ID: | 202502041422.dpg233g3z5i4@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Feb-04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 03.02.25 08:50, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On 2025-Feb-03, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> >
> > > VALID, NOT ENFORCED changed to VALID, ENFORCED - data validation
> > > required, constraint is enforced
> > There's no such thing as a VALID NOT ENFORCED constraint. It just
> > cannot exist.
>
> The way I interpret this is that the VALID flag is just recording what would
> happen if the constraint was enforced. So you you take a [NOT] VALID
> ENFORCED constraint and switch it to NOT ENFORCED and back and you get back
> to where you started.
I think it is dangerous. You can easily end up with undetected
violating rows in the table, and then you won't be able to dump/restore
it anymore.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"After a quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! PostgreSQL was
amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually astounded by
learning new features and techniques made available by the continuing work of
the development team."
Berend Tober, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg01009.php
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nisha Moond | 2025-02-04 14:26:00 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-02-04 14:00:49 | should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins? |