Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38
Date: 2024-09-20 22:33:16
Message-ID: 20240920223316.muvdgqekzh6dvcii@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2024-09-19 20:12:13 +0200, Paul Foerster wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> > On 19 Sep 2024, at 19:43, Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> wrote:
> >
> > I wrote a small script[1] which prints all unicode code points and a few
> > selected[2] longer strings in order. If you run that before and after
> > the upgrade and the output doesn't change, you are probably be fine.
[caveats]
> >
> > [1] https://git.hjp.at:3000/hjp/pgcollate
> > [2] The selection is highly subjective and totally unscientific.
> > Additions are welcome.
>
> I'm not a Python specialist but I take it that the script need
> psycopg2, which we probably don't have. So I'd have to build some sort
> of venv around that like I had to do to get Patroni working on our
> systems.

I don't use SLES but I would expect it to have an RPM for it.

If you have any test machine which you can upgrade before the production
servers (and given the amount of data and availability requirements you
have, I really hope you do) you should be set.

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Kortschak 2024-09-21 03:33:55 Re: re-novice coming back to pgsql: porting an SQLite update statement to postgres
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2024-09-20 22:17:18 Re: IO related waits