| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Baehler Thomas SBB CFF FFS <thomas(dot)baehler2(at)sbb(dot)ch>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails |
| Date: | 2024-08-20 02:25:13 |
| Message-ID: | 202408200225.lasmb6pskolh@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-Aug-20, Tender Wang wrote:
> > As I understand, this fix needs to be applied all the way back to 12,
> > because the overall functionality is that old. However, in branches 14
> > and back, the patch doesn't apply cleanly, because of the changes we
> > made in commit f4566345cf40 :-( I'm tempted to fix it in branches 15,
> > 16, 17, master now and potentially backpatch later, to avoid dragging
> > things along further. It's taken long enough already.
>
> I haven't seen this patch on master. Is there something that we fotget to
> handle?
I haven't pushed it yet, mostly because of being unsure about not doing
anything for the oldest branches (14 and back).
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Java is clearly an example of money oriented programming" (A. Stepanov)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tender Wang | 2024-08-20 02:45:47 | Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2024-08-20 01:56:52 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |