Re: Meson far from ready on Windows

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Meson far from ready on Windows
Date: 2024-07-17 16:49:47
Message-ID: 20240717164947.4bqmfgsyn3yqcaro@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2024-07-16 15:53:45 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
> Other than that, it looks pretty solid.

Thanks for looking! I'm thinking of pushing the first few patches soon-ish.

I'm debating between going for 17 + HEAD or also applying it to 16, to keep
the trees more similar.

> Looks like we could help future us out by teaching compiler.find_library()
> to take a list of names to look at similar to how dependency() works now.

Yep, that'd be useful.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-07-17 17:01:42 Re: CI, macports, darwin version problems
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2024-07-17 16:49:35 Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin