From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts |
Date: | 2024-04-07 21:09:24 |
Message-ID: | 20240407210924.fvwfwbzms3bvtfcd@awork3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2024-04-07 22:35:47 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I haven't investigated, but I'd considering it works on 64-bit, I guess
> it's not considering alignment somewhere. I can dig more if needed.
I think I may the problem:
#define KeeperBlock(set) ((BumpBlock *) ((char *) (set) + sizeof(BumpContext)))
#define IsKeeperBlock(set, blk) (KeeperBlock(set) == (blk))
BumpContextCreate():
...
/* Fill in the initial block's block header */
block = (BumpBlock *) (((char *) set) + MAXALIGN(sizeof(BumpContext)));
/* determine the block size and initialize it */
firstBlockSize = allocSize - MAXALIGN(sizeof(BumpContext));
BumpBlockInit(set, block, firstBlockSize);
...
((MemoryContext) set)->mem_allocated = allocSize;
void
BumpCheck(MemoryContext context)
...
if (IsKeeperBlock(bump, block))
total_allocated += block->endptr - (char *) bump;
...
I suspect that KeeperBlock() isn't returning true, because IsKeeperBlock misses
the MAXALIGN(). I think that about fits with:
> #4 0x008f0088 in BumpCheck (context=0x131e330) at bump.c:808
> 808 Assert(total_allocated == context->mem_allocated);
> (gdb) p total_allocated
> $1 = 8120
> (gdb) p context->mem_allocated
> $2 = 8192
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-07 21:17:37 | Re: pub/sub - specifying optional parameters without values. |
Previous Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2024-04-07 21:01:26 | Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP) |