Re: Fix a typo in pg_rotate_logfile

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix a typo in pg_rotate_logfile
Date: 2024-02-12 20:46:13
Message-ID: 20240212204613.GA1815134@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:39:06PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 12 Feb 2024, at 21:32, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I happened to notice a typo in pg_rotate_logfile in ipc/signalfuncs.c
>> - the hint message wrongly mentions that pg_logfile_rotate is part of
>> the core; which is actually not. pg_logfile_rotate is an adminpack's
>> 1.0 SQL function dropped in 2.0. The core defines pg_rotate_logfile
>> SQL function instead, so use that. Here's a patch to fix the typo.
>
> Nice catch! This needs to be backpatched all the way down to 12 as that
> function wen't away a long time ago (it was marked as deprecated all the way
> back in 9.1).

This is a bit strange because, with this patch, the HINT suggests using a
function with the same name as the one it lives in. IIUC this is because
adminpack's pg_logfile_rotate() uses pg_rotate_logfile(), while core's
pg_rotate_logfile() uses pg_rotate_logfile_v2(). I suppose trying to
rename these might be more trouble than it's worth at this point, though...

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-02-12 20:50:12 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2024-02-12 20:46:00 Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible