From: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey(at)proteus-tech(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page |
Date: | 2024-01-02 01:22:42 |
Message-ID: | 20240101192242.608a25cb@slate.karlpinc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:58:47 -0800
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1/1/24 11:44, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:40:49 -0500
> > "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> >> I don't really follow what you're suggesting here.
> >
> > The suggestion here is to first, change the "object-relational"
> > sentence as has been discussed. (Then, tl,dr; use a interactive
> > "word cloud") But instead of coming up with wording describing
> > functionality, workloads, etc., to simply say "PostgrSQL does lots
> > more stuff." on the home page and link that to a page with nothing
> > but keywords. The keywords can be linked to descriptions or project
> > pages, or not.
> >
> > That way nobody has to write sentences, and more importantly, nobody
> > has to maintain much when there's a new hot technology or
> > figure out what's important enough to put on the home page. Just
> > add a new keyword to the keywords page. (Especially labor free if
> > the keyword page is a pg wiki page.)
> >
> > To extend this idea, just a list of keywords is not engaging.
> > Categorizing the keywords by attaching one or more tags to each
> > opens up possibilities for interaction and alternate ways to view
> > the keywords. In particular the user can find keywords by tag and
> > so keywords need not be categorized in a fixed fashion.
> > This would likely only be interesting if the keywords were linked to
> > somewhere so that after getting a relevant set of keywords
> > the reader could follow the links to find information or tools.
>
> Please no, this is just another version of word salad.
Maybe so. Though it seems common and useful to have one
thing categorized into multiple categories. I think
categories guide the inquisitive.
But this is all useless hand-waving, at least for me, because
I'm not volunteering to do the work. Apologies if I've taken
too much of your time.
Regards,
Karl <kop(at)karlpinc(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Benjamin Scherrey | 2024-01-02 06:19:58 | Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-01-01 22:58:47 | Re: Describing Postgres as "object-relational" on the home page |