At Thu, 20 Jul 2023 16:28:02 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> That is, the function is not parallel-safe. In fact it is marked as
> 'r' in pg_proc.proparallel. So, the real question appears to be how it
> ended up running in a paralell worker.
Stupid. What we should do here would be ensuring the funtion doesn't
invoke parallel workers, maybe.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center