From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18014: Releasing catcache entries makes schema_to_xmlschema() fail when parallel workers are used |
Date: | 2023-07-20 07:28:02 |
Message-ID: | 20230720.162802.905550494964943231.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
At Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:00:01 +0300, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> The parallel worker doesn't have a lock on pg_class_oid_index before
> executing the query, so it gets the lock and res == LOCKACQUIRE_OK
> (not
> LOCKACQUIRE_ALREADY_CLEAR as in a regular backend case), after that it
> processes invalidation messages (this can make the backend use a newer
> catalog snapshot), and at the end it does systable_endscan() ->
> index_close() -> UnlockRelationId() -> LockRelease()...
> Thus, on a next iteration it gets the lock anew, with the res ==
> LOCKACQUIRE_OK
> again, and all that ceremony repeated.
>
> It's not clear to me, whether this parallel worker behavior is
> expected and
> if so, what to fix to avoid the test failure.
That is, the function is not parallel-safe. In fact it is marked as
'r' in pg_proc.proparallel. So, the real question appears to be how it
ended up running in a paralell worker.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-07-20 07:44:59 | Re: BUG #18014: Releasing catcache entries makes schema_to_xmlschema() fail when parallel workers are used |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-07-20 06:01:42 | Re: BUG #17928: Standby fails to decode WAL on termination of primary |