Re: check_strxfrm_bug()

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: check_strxfrm_bug()
Date: 2023-07-01 16:25:45
Message-ID: 20230701162545.GA2854189@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 01:02:21PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 11:03 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > The GCC build farm has just received some SPARC hardware new enough to
> > run modern Solaris (hostname gcc106), so if wrasse were moved over
> > there we could finally assume all systems have POSIX 2008 (AKA
> > SUSv4)'s locale_t.
>
> That would look something like this.

This removes thirty-eight ifdefs, most of them located in the middle of
function bodies. That's far more beneficial than most proposals to raise
minimum requirements. +1 for revoking support for wrasse's OS version.
(wrasse wouldn't move, but it would stop testing v17+.)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2023-07-01 16:39:07 Re: Does a cancelled REINDEX CONCURRENTLY need to be messy?
Previous Message Joseph Koshakow 2023-07-01 15:33:51 Re: Preventing non-superusers from altering session authorization