Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres
Date: 2023-04-10 14:43:59
Message-ID: 20230410144359.urna2n5lpun22eo4@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2023-04-10 14:35:38 +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> All I really wanted to hint at is that "incoming call
> timestamp" may work pretty well in given settings but does
> not _always_ make for a "unique enough" key.

This is true for all natural primary keys: Any attribute of an entity
which is unique for a given application may not be unique for other
applications.

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arquimedes Aguirre 2023-04-11 00:55:44 FW: Error!
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2023-04-10 12:35:38 Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres