Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Date: 2023-04-07 21:27:09
Message-ID: 20230407212709.5mdny4uqi7gbhrao@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-04-07 22:54:01 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> That looks good to me

Cool.

I think I'll push these in a few hours. While this needed more changes than
I'd like shortly before the freeze, I think they're largely not in very
interesting bits and pieces - and this feature has been in the works for about
three eternities, and it is blocking a bunch of highly requested features.

If anybody still has energy, I would appreciate a look at 0001, 0002, the new
pieces I added, to make what's now 0003 and 0004 cleaner.

> 0005 is missing author/reviewer, I'd propose:
> [...]

Thanks, I'll integrate them...

> It's hard (given the amount of emails that have been send during all this time),

Indeed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-04-07 21:33:32 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-07 21:19:50 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints