Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu)" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date: 2023-02-21 18:00:11
Message-ID: 20230221180011.GA4849@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:13:10PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> The test enforces a checkpoint after the table creation on the
> template, so what about testing it also without a checkpoint, like the
> extended version attached? I have tweaked a few things in the test,
> while on it.

What is the purpose of testing it without the checkpoint? Other than that
question, the patch looks reasonable to me.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-21 18:42:09 Re: refactoring relation extension and BufferAlloc(), faster COPY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-21 17:29:17 Re: Commitfest Manager