From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet |
Date: | 2023-01-19 19:46:01 |
Message-ID: | 20230119194601.GA4105788@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:17:35PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:54 PM Nathan Bossart
> <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > OK. Might be worth a short comment.
>>
>> I added one.
>
> Thanks. I'd move it to the inner indentation level so it's closer to
> the test at issue.
I meant for it to cover the call to HaveNFreeProcs() as well since the same
idea applies. I left it the same for now, but if you still think it makes
sense to move it, I'll do so.
> I would also suggest reordering the documentation and the
> postgresql.conf.sample file so that reserved_connections precedes
> superuser_reserved_connections, instead of following it.
Makes sense.
> Other than that, this seems like it might be about ready to commit,
> barring objections or bug reports.
Awesome.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-Code-review-for-ea92368.patch | text/x-diff | 1.6 KB |
v5-0002-Rename-ReservedBackends-to-SuperuserReservedConne.patch | text/x-diff | 4.1 KB |
v5-0003-Introduce-reserved_connections-and-pg_use_reserve.patch | text/x-diff | 13.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-01-19 20:12:12 | Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-01-19 19:39:26 | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |