Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet
Date: 2023-01-19 20:13:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoboMn6+31ZCV9a1-Ze6SnbF4iaFZisbimoYPkETzJD4ZQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 2:46 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks. I'd move it to the inner indentation level so it's closer to
> > the test at issue.
>
> I meant for it to cover the call to HaveNFreeProcs() as well since the same
> idea applies. I left it the same for now, but if you still think it makes
> sense to move it, I'll do so.

Hmm, OK. If you want to leave it where it is, I won't argue further.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-01-19 20:16:00 Re: BF animal malleefowl reported an failure in 001_password.pl
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-01-19 20:12:12 Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation