Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: almost-super-user problems that we haven't fixed yet
Date: 2023-01-19 19:17:35
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYEQTEPi_PD3_TW+N86+dR5Qkfy+JKJoT0YAfXWhAQjbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:54 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > OK. Might be worth a short comment.
>
> I added one.

Thanks. I'd move it to the inner indentation level so it's closer to
the test at issue.

I would also suggest reordering the documentation and the
postgresql.conf.sample file so that reserved_connections precedes
superuser_reserved_connections, instead of following it.

Other than that, this seems like it might be about ready to commit,
barring objections or bug reports.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ankit Kumar Pandey 2023-01-19 19:26:13 Re: [PATCH] Teach planner to further optimize sort in distinct
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-01-19 19:11:46 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners