Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
Date: 2022-12-12 00:51:49
Message-ID: 20221212005149.yrw7qrjq2u5guuf3@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-12-12 08:40:04 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> What about just adding a counter tracking the number of checksum
> failures for relfilenodes in a new structure related to them (note
> that I did not write PgStat_StatTabEntry)?

Why were you thinking of tracking it separately from PgStat_StatTabEntry?

I think there's a good argument for starting to track some stats based on the
relfilenode, rather the oid, because it'd allow us to track e.g. the number of
writes for a relation too (we don't have the oid when writing out
buffers). But that's a relatively large change...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-12 01:08:08 Re: Checksum errors in pg_stat_database
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-12-12 00:31:27 Re: GetNewObjectId question