From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New docs chapter on Transaction Management and related changes |
Date: | 2022-12-01 18:21:42 |
Message-ID: | 20221201182142.tq3xmnf6umvirbd2@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Dec-01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Patch reverted in all back branches. I was hoping to get support for
> more aggressive backpatches of docs, but obviously failed. I should
> have been clearer about my intent to backpatch, and will have to
> consider these issues in future doc backpatches.
FWIW I am in favor of backpatching doc fixes (even if they're not
completely trivial, such as 02d43ad6262d) and smallish additions of
content (63a370938). But we've added a few terms to the glossary
(606c38459, 3dddb2a82) and those weren't backpatched, which seems
appropriate to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"The problem with the facetime model is not just that it's demoralizing, but
that the people pretending to work interrupt the ones actually working."
(Paul Graham)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-12-01 19:04:00 | Re: Error-safe user functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-12-01 18:14:35 | Re: Error-safe user functions |