Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Date: 2022-11-10 12:19:51
Message-ID: 20221110121951.p6njilv7z3rtjn47@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-Oct-06, Amit Langote wrote:

> Actually, List of Bitmapsets turned out to be something that doesn't
> just-work with our Node infrastructure, which I found out thanks to
> -DWRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES. So, I had to go ahead and add
> first-class support for copy/equal/write/read support for Bitmapsets,
> such that writeNode() can write appropriately labeled versions of them
> and nodeRead() can read them as Bitmapsets. That's done in 0003. I
> didn't actually go ahead and make *all* Bitmapsets in the plan trees
> to be Nodes, but maybe 0003 can be expanded to do that. We won't need
> to make gen_node_support.pl emit *_BITMAPSET_FIELD() blurbs then; can
> just use *_NODE_FIELD().

Hmm, is this related to what Tom posted as part of his 0004 in
https://postgr.es/m/2901865.1667685211@sss.pgh.pa.us

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-11-10 12:42:14 Re: Fix comments atop ReorderBufferAddInvalidations
Previous Message Hamid Akhtar 2022-11-10 12:01:15 Re: Allow pageinspect's bt_page_stats function to return a set of rows instead of a single row