| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade test failure |
| Date: | 2022-10-18 04:31:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20221018043144.GF7745@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 01:06:15PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:47:37AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > * Server 2019, as used on CI, still uses the traditional NT semantics
> > (unlink is asynchronous, when all handles closes)
> > * the fix I proposed has the right effect (I will follow up with tests
> > to demonstrate)
>
> Wow, nice investigation. And cirrus does not offer a newer option
> either..
Currently Andres builds images based on cirrus's 2019 image, but I think
we could use any windows docker image.
> Do you think that Windows server 2022 (successor of 2019) is
> able to use POSIX semantics for unlink()?
I think it's possible to use it now, like what's done here.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/40/3347/
The only caveat is that it's done conditionally.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-10-18 09:47:48 | pgsql: Improve errhint for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ADD/DROP PUBLICATION |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-18 04:06:15 | Re: pg_upgrade test failure |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2022-10-18 05:06:34 | RE: [Proposal] Add foreign-server health checks infrastructure |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-10-18 04:23:39 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |