Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Date: 2022-09-30 04:17:41
Message-ID: 20220930041741.77vrc2scbioma7iu@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-09-29 22:16:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Any opinions about whether to do this only in head or backpatch to 15?
>
> HEAD should be sufficient, IMO.

Pushed. I think we should add some more divergent options to increase the
coverage. E.g. a different xlog pagesize, a smaller segmement size so we can
test the "segment boundary" code (although we don't currently allow < 1GB via
normal means right now) etc. But that's for later.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-09-30 04:21:32 Re: meson vs mingw, plpython, readline and other fun
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-09-30 04:07:34 interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around