| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks |
| Date: | 2022-09-22 23:46:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20220922234640.qvidamudjb57vciv@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-09-22 17:44:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was confused about how come the new patches I'd just posted in
> the 3848 CF item (write/read support for raw parse trees) are
> showing a mix of passes and fails in the cfbot. I eventually
> realized that the fail results are all old and stale, because
> (for example) there's no longer a "FreeBSD - 13" task to run,
> just "FreeBSD - 13 - Meson". This seems tremendously confusing.
> Can we get the cfbot to not display no-longer-applicable results?
Somewhat tangentially - it seemed the right thing at the time [TM], but now I
wonder if tacking on the buildsystem like I did is the best way? As long as we
have both I think we need it in some form...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-09-22 23:46:53 | Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-22 22:57:34 | Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks |