| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cfbot vs. changes in the set of CI tasks |
| Date: | 2022-09-22 23:50:52 |
| Message-ID: | 2009613.1663890652@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-09-22 17:44:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I was confused about how come the new patches I'd just posted in
>> the 3848 CF item (write/read support for raw parse trees) are
>> showing a mix of passes and fails in the cfbot. I eventually
>> realized that the fail results are all old and stale, because
>> (for example) there's no longer a "FreeBSD - 13" task to run,
>> just "FreeBSD - 13 - Meson". This seems tremendously confusing.
>> Can we get the cfbot to not display no-longer-applicable results?
> Somewhat tangentially - it seemed the right thing at the time [TM], but now I
> wonder if tacking on the buildsystem like I did is the best way? As long as we
> have both I think we need it in some form...
Yeah, I think those names are fine for now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-09-23 00:02:30 | Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-09-22 23:46:53 | Re: Making C function declaration parameter names consistent with corresponding definition names |