From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop? |
Date: | 2022-07-21 09:02:59 |
Message-ID: | 20220721.180259.183470059013748189.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:09:09 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> Hi,
>
> After the commit [1], is it correct to say errmsg("invalid data in file
> \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE))); in do_pg_backup_stop() when we hold the
> contents in backend global memory, not actually reading from backup_label
> file? However, it is correct to say that in read_backup_label.
>
> IMO, we can either say "invalid backup_label contents found" or we can be
> more descriptive and say "invalid "START WAL LOCATION" line found in
> backup_label content" and "invalid "BACKUP FROM" line found in
> backup_label content" and so on.
>
> Thoughts?
Previously there the case the "char *labelfile" is loaded from a file,
but currently it is alwasy a string build on the process. In that
sense, nowadays it is a kind of internal error, which I think is not
supposed to be exposed to users.
So I think we can leave the code alone to avoid back-patching
obstacles. But if we decided to change the code around, I'd like to
change the string into a C struct, so that we don't need to parse it.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-07-21 10:07:36 | RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-07-21 08:53:48 | Re: make -C libpq check fails obscurely if tap tests are disabled |