| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi |
| Date: | 2022-07-19 15:31:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20220719153149.lhbir3wh4sgfkfe7@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2022-07-19 16:28:07 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Anyway, the minimal patch that makes plpgsql_check tests pass is
> attached. This seems a bit random. Maybe it'd be better to have a
> plpgsql_internal.h with functions that are exported only for plpgsql
> itself, and keep plpgsql.h with a set of functions, all marked
> PGDLLEXPORT, that are for external use.
It does seem a bit random. But I think we probably should err on the side of
adding more declarations, rather than the oposite.
I like the plpgsql_internal.h idea, but probably done separately?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2022-07-19 15:37:11 | Re: pgsql: Default to hidden visibility for extension libraries where possi |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-19 15:18:28 | pgsql: Estimate cost of elided SubqueryScan, Append, MergeAppend nodes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-07-19 15:37:03 | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-19 15:19:39 | Re: Costing elided SubqueryScans more nearly correctly |