| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: testclient.exe installed under MSVC |
| Date: | 2022-05-03 13:50:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20220503135038.GA1645213@rfd.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:04:26PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 3 May 2022, at 04:02, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:14:50PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> >> Renaming is probably the best option given how MSVC works. Using a pg_ prefix
> >> makes them sound like actual useful tools though with (albeit small) risk for
> >> confusion? Noah's suggestion of libpq_ is perhaps better: libpq_testclient.
> >
> > Agreed. libpq_testclient and libpq_uri_regress sound fine.
>
> The attached works in both Linux and (Cirrus CI) MSVC for me.
Michael Paquier recommended s/-/_/ for uri-regress, and I agree with that.
What do you think?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-05-03 13:58:09 | Re: testclient.exe installed under MSVC |
| Previous Message | Godfrin, Philippe E | 2022-05-03 13:30:32 | pg_stat_statements |